Phuzzy Phantom math


At one time or another we’ve all been admonished to “Do the math!” But here’s one rationale for not doing it in the Phantom universe.

Over the course of “The Aeronaut,” the story set to conclude this week in the daily pages, some readers wondered how only two generations could separate the 19th Phantom in 1918 and the 21st Phantom in 2013. How could the Phantom’s grandfather have been in his prime when Ted West’s great-grandfather — the aeronaut — was not much more than a boy?

We’d not be tempted to do the math with Phantoms who lived and died earlier in the line; if the 21st Phantom were to speak, say, of the death of the 4th Phantom in 1646, or the 1738 birth of the boy who would grow to become the 11th Phantom.

To make the math work in the 20th and 21st centuries, the great Lee Falk, in his day, would have had to kill off at least two Phantoms. The 21st would have been long overdue in the crypt by 1977 — when he finally got around to marrying Diana Palmer! And now, nearly 15 years after Lee Falk’s death, I’d be straining mathematical credulity if I hadn’t set up the death of a 23rd Phantom by now.

If “The Aeronaut” had starred a young 24th Phantom instead of the 21st that Falk introduced to the world, there’d be no mathematical distraction. To be sure, there’s great human drama to be had in killing off and replacing The Man Who Cannot Die every 16 to 22 years, but my own view is that the Phantom universe would be much diminished if we were to bind the narrative to real time.

So, to keep our one-and-only 21st Phantom in business, we resort to sleight of hand; to a subtle dodge in the service of the illusion. We simply don’t call attention to the math.

In “The Aeronaut,” if you notice, the 21st Phantom never spoke of his “grandfather” in the trenches of World War I. It was always “my ancestor,” or “the 19th Phantom.”

Or both.


 Tony DePaul, November 26, 2013, Rhode Island, USA



6 thoughts on “Phuzzy Phantom math

  1. Thanks for continuing the Phantom strip with so much respect. And as a longtime reader – decades-long – I’m really happy that I will not outlive our current Phantom.

  2. I’d never even considered the math before reading this. Heck, I’ve been reading both the vintage & current stories on Comics Kingdom, and hadn’t even consciously thought about whether the two were the same man or of different generations. It’s kind-of like watching the 1950s/1980s/1990s Superman stuff – we all just go with it.

    • That’s the way I see it, too, Tim. For me, it’s a What-Would-Lee-Do? question. If Lee Falk didn’t kill off the 21st Phantom between 1936 and 1999, I seem to think he’ll be around for quite a while yet! His kids are aging a bit faster than he, but not by much. We’ve got them into their early teens now. In real time, they’d be in their mid-thirties.

      In 2016 or so, look for stories that call attention to Kit and Heloise preparing for young adulthood and becoming more independent of the Phantom and Diana. Discussion on that between here and New York started just last week.

  3. Treat your eyes to a homemade facial like this once a week.
    Though a tad bit on the expensive side, buyers often love how the
    cream gives them great results per dollar. If all
    these seem gut-wrenching and increase your frustration all the more,
    then it is better to turn to home-made remedies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.